<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Great Paperless Workflow Post At Interface Matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.documentsnap.com/great-paperless-workflow-post-at-interface-matters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.documentsnap.com/great-paperless-workflow-post-at-interface-matters/</link>
	<description>Learn How To Go Paperless With Easy Document Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:47:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrooksD</title>
		<link>http://www.documentsnap.com/great-paperless-workflow-post-at-interface-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>BrooksD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.documentsnap.com/great-paperless-workflow-post-at-interface-matters/#comment-565</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I hear you. The database thing is a bit hardcore for me, but it sounds like he lives inside Lotus Notes. So I guess, for him, having everything in a Notes db makes sense. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I hear you. The database thing is a bit hardcore for me, but it sounds like he lives inside Lotus Notes. So I guess, for him, having everything in a Notes db makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.documentsnap.com/great-paperless-workflow-post-at-interface-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.documentsnap.com/great-paperless-workflow-post-at-interface-matters/#comment-561</guid>
		<description>Watched the videos. All sounded OK until, after scanning and naming the file(s), said &quot;... and the next step is to use a database...&quot;  What!!? 
 
So, having saved all that time not fussing with filing, he&#039;s going to spend that time, and more I bet, entering info about every document in a database!?  Holy paradigm shift, Batman! - NOT. This is the electronic equivalent of physically filing paper shuffling drudgery. 
 
Does that database go into that dropbox (web-based doc backup) cloud too? Does he have lotus notes on every machine he wants to access from? Yet MORE software is needed to get at documents?  
 
IMHO... 
Once a doc is in bits in the computer, and in bits in the shredder (ha, ha. I make a funny) I&#039;m going to find docs three ways: Decent file names, tags, and by content if I make the doc &quot;searchable&quot; (as discussed in the videos). No database required. 
 
Well, in a sense The operating system is the database. A database captures information and has ways of finding that stuff efficiently.  Gosh, I just described Macintosh OS X. ... OK, and Windoze too. 
 
When I scan they &quot;go to&quot; my tagging software, where I give it a name and *quickly* add tags and  ... DONE. To find a doc, just search for it. Duh. Good file names and tagging technique help me find it fast.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watched the videos. All sounded OK until, after scanning and naming the file(s), said &quot;&#8230; and the next step is to use a database&#8230;&quot;  What!!? </p>
<p>So, having saved all that time not fussing with filing, he&#039;s going to spend that time, and more I bet, entering info about every document in a database!?  Holy paradigm shift, Batman! &#8211; NOT. This is the electronic equivalent of physically filing paper shuffling drudgery. </p>
<p>Does that database go into that dropbox (web-based doc backup) cloud too? Does he have lotus notes on every machine he wants to access from? Yet MORE software is needed to get at documents?  </p>
<p>IMHO&#8230;<br />
Once a doc is in bits in the computer, and in bits in the shredder (ha, ha. I make a funny) I&#039;m going to find docs three ways: Decent file names, tags, and by content if I make the doc &quot;searchable&quot; (as discussed in the videos). No database required. </p>
<p>Well, in a sense The operating system is the database. A database captures information and has ways of finding that stuff efficiently.  Gosh, I just described Macintosh OS X. &#8230; OK, and Windoze too. </p>
<p>When I scan they &quot;go to&quot; my tagging software, where I give it a name and *quickly* add tags and  &#8230; DONE. To find a doc, just search for it. Duh. Good file names and tagging technique help me find it fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 301/304 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.documentsnap.com @ 2012-02-07 22:50:30 -->
