<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ask The Readers: Best Windows Document Software?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.documentsnap.com/ask-the-readers-best-windows-document-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.documentsnap.com/ask-the-readers-best-windows-document-software/</link>
	<description>Learn How To Go Paperless With Easy Document Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:47:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrooksD</title>
		<link>http://www.documentsnap.com/ask-the-readers-best-windows-document-software/comment-page-1/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>BrooksD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.documentsnap.com/?p=178#comment-246</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot for your comment Occam! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for your comment Occam!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occam</title>
		<link>http://www.documentsnap.com/ask-the-readers-best-windows-document-software/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Occam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 05:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.documentsnap.com/?p=178#comment-245</guid>
		<description>I tried the demo of Rack2-Filer v 5.0. 
 
I found it to be too slow to be useful on a 3.2 GHz / 2GB machine.  It&#039;s a pity, since it&#039;s a lovely idea, and it looks nice, and actually looking through the binders is fairly quick and quite intuitive. 
 
Unfortunately, the data import is really slow, taking over a minute to import a few pages of PDF or a dozen JPG files.  The thumbnails are small, making it hard to distinguish similar documents from each other - the June power bill, as opposed to the one from May, for example. 
 
Other gripes include nonexistent support for obvious keyboard shortcuts (like &quot;Esc&quot; to exit the viewer application, left/right arrow when viewing files in the Workspace, etc.), horribly slow OCR, pages too small in &quot;regular&quot; mode, no controls in &quot;full screen&quot; mode, etc.  Basic page manipulations like shuffling pages around within a binder seem to be difficult or impossible. 
 
Most operations, like adding a divider sheet, are manual, with the program not filling in much metadata for you.  It has a sort of &quot;key block&quot; that it tries to pull metadata from, but without any intelligence. 
 
It might work better with a ScanSnap, which does it&#039;s own OCR and can put files directly into Rack2.  But manipulating them once they&#039;re in remains much harder than it should be. 
 
If you would enjoy spending your life organizing your digital documents, you&#039;ll like this.  If you feel you have better things to do with your time than manipulate digital pages, then find something else.  A straight folder structure will be far more efficient than Rack2-Filer. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried the demo of Rack2-Filer v 5.0. </p>
<p>I found it to be too slow to be useful on a 3.2 GHz / 2GB machine.  It&#039;s a pity, since it&#039;s a lovely idea, and it looks nice, and actually looking through the binders is fairly quick and quite intuitive. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, the data import is really slow, taking over a minute to import a few pages of PDF or a dozen JPG files.  The thumbnails are small, making it hard to distinguish similar documents from each other &#8211; the June power bill, as opposed to the one from May, for example. </p>
<p>Other gripes include nonexistent support for obvious keyboard shortcuts (like &quot;Esc&quot; to exit the viewer application, left/right arrow when viewing files in the Workspace, etc.), horribly slow OCR, pages too small in &quot;regular&quot; mode, no controls in &quot;full screen&quot; mode, etc.  Basic page manipulations like shuffling pages around within a binder seem to be difficult or impossible. </p>
<p>Most operations, like adding a divider sheet, are manual, with the program not filling in much metadata for you.  It has a sort of &quot;key block&quot; that it tries to pull metadata from, but without any intelligence. </p>
<p>It might work better with a ScanSnap, which does it&#039;s own OCR and can put files directly into Rack2.  But manipulating them once they&#039;re in remains much harder than it should be. </p>
<p>If you would enjoy spending your life organizing your digital documents, you&#039;ll like this.  If you feel you have better things to do with your time than manipulate digital pages, then find something else.  A straight folder structure will be far more efficient than Rack2-Filer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://www.documentsnap.com/ask-the-readers-best-windows-document-software/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.documentsnap.com/?p=178#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Hi. I just got an ScanSnap S1500 and am just beginning to dabble in how to organize the scanned documents. So far, i use a folder structure (still evolving), but am thinking OneNote might be handy once i get more familiar with the various options. One challenge is deciding how best to use Acrobat in the process. One PDF containing a year&#039;s worth of similar documents is nice, but in other cases a single PDF per document makes sense. It&#039;d be nice to have a file tagging (and search) solution so that physical folder structure is less critical. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I just got an ScanSnap S1500 and am just beginning to dabble in how to organize the scanned documents. So far, i use a folder structure (still evolving), but am thinking OneNote might be handy once i get more familiar with the various options. One challenge is deciding how best to use Acrobat in the process. One PDF containing a year&#039;s worth of similar documents is nice, but in other cases a single PDF per document makes sense. It&#039;d be nice to have a file tagging (and search) solution so that physical folder structure is less critical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/11 queries in 0.016 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 318/321 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.documentsnap.com @ 2012-02-07 22:34:53 -->
